Translate

Translate

lunes, 2 de julio de 2012

Avaya Aims New Low Cost/Higher Value Compact Switches at SMBs, SMEs & Branch Offices



Quick Take

Competitive Positives
• Enterprise class features at a very aggressive price point
• Stacking architecture offers greater scale at a lower cost
• IP Office integration simplifies deployment of both switches and VoIP
• Chassis-like flexibility for a fixed form factor price
• Early strong demand indicates an unmet need in the market segment
Competitive Concerns
• Avaya suffers from poor visibility in the market
• Avaya has been slow to create synergies with VoIP/UC products
• Executive churn causing channel concern
• Cisco fields a broader portfolio in this market segment
• How to displace HP switches among Avaya VoIP customers?

Event Summary
Avaya launched a new line of compact Fast and Gigabit Ethernet switches for SMBs, SMEs and remote branches that promise lower operational costs, offer aggressive pricing and deliver integration with Avaya’s IP Office collaboration offering. The six new ERS 3500 switches also support more flexible and scalable stacking to allow customers to start small and easily expand.


Analytical SummaryPerspective
• Positive on Avaya’s new ERS 3500 compact Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet switches, because Avaya has created a compelling package of aggressive pricing, enterprise class features, good integration with its IP Office collaboration suite and greater stacking capacity and performance in the new switches. That combination of benefits should help it gain the attention of new prospects, and it gives IP Office users a compelling reason to use Avaya switches, rather than rival switches.
Vendor Importance
• Moderate to Avaya, because the new ERS 3500s complete Avaya’s Ethernet switching portfolio refresh and adds a compelling alternative for SMBs and SMEs compared to more costly market leaders. At the same time, Avaya is finally creating synergies between its compact switches and Avaya’s IP Office collaboration suite.
Market Impact
• Low on the compact Ethernet switch market, because Avaya does not have as large a presence there as some rivals, and it is still taking time and will require consistent execution to recruit its IP telephony-focused channel partners to take on selling its Ethernet switches. In addition, rivals have moved fast to refresh their compact switch lines, and there has been good innovation in the space over the last 18 to 24 months.

Competitive StrengthsCompetitive Positives
• Avaya included enterprise class features in the new ERS 3500s at an aggressive price point, making it between 30% to 50% less than some comparable switches by Avaya’s reckoning, and over 50% less than Cisco Catalyst 2960 C switches.

• Avaya in the next software release for the switches will have very compelling stacking capabilities with the new ERS 3500 switches, enabling four times the performance and capacity available with Cisco’s stacking, and it won’t require a separate license to take advantage of it. The Resilient Stacking feature will allow up to eight units to be stacked for a virtual backplane capacity of 80 Gbps, delivering high performance in a compact form factor.

• Avaya has created a compelling bundle combining the IP Office collaboration suite and the new compact switches, making deployment of both very quick and simple. A built-in configuration script allows a simple “Run IP Office” command to enable the Avaya IP PBX and VoIP phones to be discovered and configured, along with the appropriate QoS services on the switch ports. The combination has also been pre-validated for interoperability and includes a solutions guide for best practices to make it easier for voice-focused channel partners to add switching to their sales and expand their share of wallet.

• The ERS 3500 switches deliver great flexibility, enabling chassis-like features for a fixed form factor price, and the ability to operate in fanless or fan mode, depending on the power budget (60 watts or greater requires a fan, less than 60 watts doesn’t).

• Initial interest in the new ERS 3500 compact switches appears to be stronger than Avaya initially anticipated, but the company is prepared to meet that demand. This likely reflects a market need greater than being satisfied today by the vendors in this space.

Competitive WeaknessesCompetitive Concerns
• Avaya is battling the perception that it is becoming irrelevant in the Ethernet switching market. Vendors that are natural rivals say they never see Avaya in competitive deals, and at least one quantitative analysis house claims that Avaya has lost market share over the last couple of years. Avaya claims otherwise, but the dispute is not helping it.

• Avaya has been slow to create synergies between its data networking and UC products, and it is just now promoting combined solutions bundles a good two years after the Nortel acquisition closed.

• Avaya has seen some significant churn in the executive ranks, and it’s caused some real concern and hesitancy among channel partners, who worry about whether the current strategy will remain in place. At the same time, partners have not been happy with the margins that Avaya has enabled, and the company pared back a number of channel partners, even while it was looking to recruit in other areas.

• Market leader Cisco sells a broader portfolio of compact switches, with separate lines for small businesses and SMEs, allowing it to segment the market to a greater extent. Cisco’s compact switches include a robust feature set, including innovative power pass through capabilities that enable downstream devices to take advantage of power available in other switches to power wireless APs, surveillance cameras and VoIP phones.

• Avaya’s existing UC/VoIP customer base relies fairly heavily on HP switches, which are also aggressively priced, and it won’t be easy to displace those switches.

Response & Recommendations
• Avaya needs to stop changing horses in mid-stream. The executive turnover is unsettling for channel partners, and gives them a reason to hesitate, rather than embrace the combined IP Office and ERS 3500 switch sales they’re promoting among partners and prospects.

• While Avaya claims that it is growing its data networking business, at least one quant house does not seem to agree. If that organization is incorrect in its figures, Avaya should work with them to correct the mistake. The perception that it is losing “relevancy,” as one trade publication put it, is damaging to Avaya’s reputation and momentum.

• As Avaya promotes cross functional selling among its voice partners, it should also demonstrate its commitment to their profitability. Partners have complained of squeezed margins, even as Avaya has worked to expand its channel. Channel partners have other alternatives, and their profitability should not be sacrificed for a planned IPO or debt reduction to private investors.

• Avaya is gunning for Enterasys’ sweet spot with these switches, and they could have a significant impact if Avaya is successful in getting its VoIP partners to sell the bundled solutions that include these new switches. Enterasys meanwhile has done little to create synergies with its Siemens Enterprise joint venture. The combined companies may want to create more cross-selling opportunities.

• HP has the second largest market footprint in this segment of the market and offers an aggressively priced portfolio of comparably featured products as well. HP should take action within its sizable channel to fend off this new competitive offering and ensure it achieves feature parity where it may be slightly deficient in order to strengthen the offering and eliminate an insertion point.

Buyer Actions
• The once-moribund campus edge switching market has seen significant new innovations over the last 18 months, and any enterprise looking to refresh the edge of these networks would do well to try to future proof those locations by taking advantage of the new innovations being made in compact switches.

• Enterprises using unmanaged switches on an ad hoc basis because of cost sensitivities would do well to evaluate the new Avaya 3500 series compact switches. Boardrooms, movable classrooms and other locations could benefit from using a low cost managed switch with enterprise features by reducing operational costs without sacrificing policy control or security features (among others).

• Avaya VoIP and UC customers using HP (or other vendor) compact Ethernet switches may want to examine the benefits of the solutions bundles Avaya is creating around the new ERS 3500 switches. Avaya has priced them aggressively, insured interoperability and made it simpler to deploy them together.

Analytical Perspective
The introduction of the new ERS 3500 compact switches for SMBs, SMEs, and branch offices completes a total refresh of Avaya’s entire switching portfolio over the last two years, demonstrating from a product portfolio perspective that Avaya is solidly committed to competing in the space and regaining its former standing as a top tier contender. The ERS 3500 line of six switches, ranging from ten to 24 ports and promising much greater stacking capabilities than more expensive market leaders, extends more enterprise-oriented features to smaller businesses while offering lower costs than leading rivals in the segment. From a price, performance and features standpoint, it has given prospects every reason to consider the Avaya compact switches along with much more widely recognized competitors. At the same time, it is finally creating product and sales synergies between its lower end switches and its IP Office products, enabling it to push Avaya VoIP channel partners to actively sell Avaya switching (and wireless) products as a bundle with the VoIP solutions. But it will have to do a better job of convincing channel partners that it is committed to its strategic direction, and to their profitability. Too much churn over the last two years in Avaya’s executive ranks has caused resellers to worry about whether initiatives begun by a predecessor would carry over with a new regime. Early this year Avaya appointed a new general manager of its data networking unit, naming former Cisco executive Marc Randall to the post, while it executed a reorganization that reduced the number of operating units from seven down to three. And as Avaya investors angled for an IPO, channel partners have seen their margins erode.

Still, Randall believes Avaya has the opportunity to grow its data networking business, and his aim is high: he was recently quoted as saying he’d like Avaya to be the third largest networking company in the world.


Avaya IP Office


Current Perspective 


Threatening


Avaya IP Office is threatening in the market for communications platforms for SMBs. It is an all-in-one communications platform running on purpose-built hardware, scaling up to 384 IP lines, and based on a proprietary operating system. Communications applications and functionality included on the platform includes firewall and VPN, data connectivity via Ethernet switch and software-based router, DHCP server, voice mail (basic and preferred editions), call recording, IVR, mobility, auto attendant, call accounting, a 128-port audio conference bridge, point to point video and four-party HD video conferencing, and either basic ACD software or a more advanced contact center software that can scale to 150 agents. This makes it easy and cost-effective for businesses to purchase and deploy the solution. IP Office version 7 shipped in early 2011 and included a BCM migration wizard, support for Nortel Audio Conferencing, support for various BCM and Norstar handsets, IP Office-to-Norstar and IP Office-to-BCM interworking, and other functionality helping facilitate gradual migration from legacy Nortel systems to IP Office.

However, IP Office lacks tight integration with Avaya’s data networking products. This will not necessarily hamper its ability to deliver a quality voice over IP experience, but it could complicate the deployment and management of the disparate voice and data components that make up the larger solution set. Lack of encryption between IP stations could cause concerns about the system’s VoIP security capabilities. And limited hardware (i.e., call processors, power supply) redundancy options could lead to reliability issues. And finally, despite Avaya’s dominant position in North America, it enjoys only limited market share and visibility in the SMB market in Europe. This could hamper IP Office’s ability to establish itself in the region where there is already considerable competition in the SMB PBX space.

Strengths and Weaknesses
Weaknesses
Strengths• IP Office is Avaya’s primary go-to-market SMB telephony solution. Though Nortel’s Business Communication Manager and various legacy key systems remain in the Avaya portfolio, each of these can now be migrated to IP Office and will gradually be weeded out of the Avaya product portfolio. 


• IP Office is a very mature product, having been actively sold in the SMB market for many years. This provides a large installed base into which Avaya and its partners can sell add-ons and services.


• IP Office provides a migration path from BCM and various key systems. This has potential of greatly expanding IP Office installed base as Nortel and Avaya key systems move to it. PARTNER Version and Norstar version, combined with key system mode, facilitate migration from legacy Avaya and Nortel key systems. 


• IP Office consists of a single hardware model (IP Office 500 V2) that is capable of scaling to both large and small businesses within the SMB market. This not only allows customers to scale their communications system up or down without purchasing and deploying new hardware, it can also simplify reseller training and support processes since Avaya partners do not need to support many hardware systems. 


• Though not as highly scalable as some SMB platforms, IP Office supports identical numbers of IP, digital and other kinds of end stations. This compares well against a number of competing platforms that support comparatively fewer digital lines than IP or vice versa.


• IP Office is not only a communications platform for SMBs, it can have a role in Avaya-based enterprise telephony solution deployments as well. Specifically, IP Office can serve as a remote site solution networked back to a centralized Avaya Aura Communication Manager PBX using Session Manager. This adds to the flexibility of the platform.
• Though IP Office is Avaya’s primary got-to-market communications system for SMBs, it shares the portfolio with Business Communication Manager, Nortel’s SMB telephony system which continues to be actively sold. This situation creates competition for IP Office within Avaya’s own portfolio of SMB products. 


• IP Office is based on a proprietary operating system (IP Office OS) rather than on Linux like a number of rival products in the market for SMB communications solutions. Linux is generally favored as an OS for communications systems because it is comparatively stable platform and cost-effective to deploy.


• Many of IP Office’s recent updates have been focused on introducing features that facilitate migration from and interworking with Nortel SMB communications systems. While this is certainly valuable given ongoing product consolidation initiatives following Avaya’s acquisition of Nortel, existing IP Office customer without legacy Nortel products in place could become concerned about IP Office software releases becoming too-Nortel centric. 


• IP Office has undergone many changes to the underlying technology in recent years, with the 406 and 412 models, as well as a platform specific to small businesses, being introduced, then withdrawn. This could cause concern among resellers seeking a stable SMB communications platform to sell, service and support. Moreover, version 7 of the IP Office software run only on the IP500 and IP500v2 control units, not on the 406 and 412. There are of course advantages to delivering customers a single platform, however companies with older IP Office hardware in place will not be able to upgrade to the new hardware without purchasing and deploying new control units
.

Back to Operaciones Integradas

Riverbed Proves Again Why It’s the Market and Technology Leader in WAN Optimization



Quick Take

Competitive Positives
• Riverbed beats chief rivals to market with UDP optimization
• Riverbed extends lead in feature-richness and customer focus
• Riverbed expands VDI support with ability to optimize Citrix ICA over SSL
• Riverbed well-positioned to increase its market dominance
Competitive Concerns
• UDP optimization is late
• Cisco’s renewed push on VDI and video optimization will give Riverbed a run for its money
• Rival Blue Coat delivers greater security integration and synergies
• Third quarter revenue shortfall a potential worry
Event Summary
December 5, 2011 – In its Riverbed Optimization System (RiOS) 7.0 software, Riverbed broadened the appeal of its WAN performance booster with acceleration for HTTP-based video, UDP applications, VDI, and integrated network performance monitoring and IPv6. The integration of its Cascade Shark packet capture and analysis allows enterprises to troubleshoot branch office networking problems remotely, without the need to install separate hardware probes.
Analytical SummaryPerspective
4
Positive on the release of Riverbed’s RiOS 7.0 software update, because it greatly broadens the appeal of Riverbed’s WAN optimization solutions, which already offered great feature-richness. The mixed bag of enhancements demonstrates Riverbed’s intent to focus on meeting customer requirements and reinforce its technology as well as market leadership.
Vendor Importance
3
Moderate to Riverbed, because the long list of new (and in some cases market-leading) enhancements essentially polish the crown jewels of Riverbed’s business to a high gloss, showing off even more facets of those gems. The enhancements also allow Riverbed to better capitalize on acquisitions by integrating acquired technologies into its Steelhead appliances, thereby increasing their value. Several new functions such as UDP acceleration, expanded video support, and VDI help to expand the addressable market for its Steelhead appliances.
Market Impact
4
High on the WAN optimization market, because in total, the wide range of new features could very likely spur even greater distance between Riverbed and its next closest rivals. Riverbed has already opened up a large lead in its dominance in the WAN optimization market, and these enhancements will only serve to extend that.
Competitive StrengthsCompetitive Positives
• Despite the fact that Riverbed did not release its UDP support when promised, it is still fairly unique in offering that acceleration; Cisco and Blue Coat do not yet have such support in their WAN optimization appliances. This gives Riverbed time-to-market advantages over its chief rivals and addresses an underserved part of the market for optimizing disaster recovery services, some VDI, and other UPD-based applications.

• Riverbed continues to demonstrate what has made it the dominant WAN optimization provider by a large margin; that is its continued focus on making its appliances among the most feature-rich in the market by adding capabilities important to its large and growing base of customers.

• Riverbed is positioning its Steelhead WAN optimization line to capitalize on the growing interest in VDI by expanding its already broad support for Citrix VMware and Microsoft VDI environments to include optimization for Citrix ICA over SSL encrypted links, as well as a new client drive mapping feature that enables the acceleration of content accessed directly from thin clients including thumb drives.

• Over the last several quarters, Riverbed has pulled away from its major competitors, now commanding just over half of the market and twice the share of its next closest competitor. With such strong momentum at its back, and its continued aggressive push to deliver consistent feature expansion based on customer requirements, Riverbed is well positioned to increase its dominance.
Competitive WeaknessesCompetitive Concerns
• Riverbed was due to deliver UDP acceleration and application visibility on the Steelhead appliances in H1 2011. The late delivery of those capabilities could cause it to lose time-to-market advantages and raise the ire of customers counting on that functionality earlier.

• Cisco has carved out a strong position in optimizing performance for VDI and video with the 4.4 release of its WAAS software, which includes context-aware data redundancy elimination features focused specifically on VDI and video traffic (see Cisco Looks to VDI and Video to Gain Advantage in WAN Optimization Market, October 7, 2011). It received good initial validation from third-party reviewers. Its renewed push in VDI traffic optimization will give Riverbed a run for its money.

• Despite the addition of new security features in RiOS 7.0, Riverbed does not deliver the same level of security that rival Blue Coat can offer by virtue of its existing WAN security business. Blue Coat recently integrated key Web security in its MACH 5 appliances that exploits the company’s new cloud-based Web security service, eliminating the need to backhaul Web traffic to a central location from remote locations.

• Despite its strong momentum, Riverbed did not achieve revenues it had anticipated in its most recently reported quarter, which resulted in a drop in its stock price. Should the next quarter come up short, it will fuel fears that the enterprise WAN optimization market is nearing saturation and open up more opportunities for vendors which do not command the same premium that Riverbed enjoys.
Response & Recommendations
• If Cisco’s context-aware DRE (data redundancy elimination) does in fact improve the user experience, especially compared to Riverbed’s VDI and video optimization, Cisco should hire third-party testers to validate that advantage. Cisco is hanging its WAN optimization hat on that innovation, and it should be prepared to demonstrate its superiority (if that exists) over the market leader.

• Once Blue Coat develops a customer base for its new Web security services integration with its MACH 5 WAN optimization appliances, it should highlight the benefits in customer case studies, looking for ways to quantify the benefits of that integration and publicizing those metrics. That integration gives Blue Coat good differentiation as well as a good cloud story, something which Riverbed does not yet have.

• Cisco needs to quash rumors that it will abandon its WAAS appliance line in favor of integrated router features/blades if it is to continue to compete successfully against Riverbed. If Cisco is committed to being a top-tier competitor in the WAN optimization market, it needs to demonstrate that commitment clearly. One of the ways to do that is to maintain better feature parity with market leader Riverbed.

• A little paranoia can be a good thing, if it motivates an organization to be vigilant for shifts in market dynamics. Riverbed has done a great job of focusing on customer requirements, but its success could blind it to subtle changes in market demands. Competitive pricing and responsiveness to partners and prospects should not be sacrificed as Riverbed continues to pull away from its nearest competitors.
Buyer Actions
• It is only a matter of time before latency-sensitive VDI pervades the enterprise network, and video has already achieved mainstream status as a tool for a variety of enterprise activities. Network operators should verse themselves on how those applications behave across the network, what their requirements are in terms of latency, and what options exist to better support them across far-flung enterprises.

• Existing Riverbed customers should be heartened by the wide range of new features Riverbed has included in the latest RiOS release (7.0). Its ‘something for everyone’ update reflects the diversity in Riverbed’s broad customer base and demonstrates the vendor’s commitment to its customers.

• Prospects looking to add WAN optimization to their networks, especially to support new latency-sensitive applications traffic such as VDI and video, should evaluate the different approaches to accelerating those newer traffic types. Each competitor brings unique techniques to the battle, along with differentiated feature sets.
Analytical Perspective
Borrowing a page from rival Cisco, Riverbed is doing a good job of integrating acquired technologies into its Steelhead appliances, thereby increasing the value of the products. Just as Cisco has integrated a variety of network services into its switches and routers, so too is Riverbed integrating acquired technologies such as its Cascade Shark packet capture and network performance management as well as Skipware satellite communications optimization into RiOS 7.0. At the same time, RiOS 7.0 addresses a wide range of customer requirements that reflect the diversity of its customer base, enabling Riverbed to broaden the appeal of its Steelhead appliances. New UDP optimization now enables Riverbed to optimize bulk file transfers used in replication or disaster recovery applications as well as some VDI implementations, such as VMware’s PCoIP protocol for VMware View. At the same time, all major WAN optimization providers recognize the new opportunities for expanding the addressable market with the enterprise adoption of video as a tool for a variety of purposes, including training, employee communications, marketing, and more. Chief rivals Cisco and Blue Coat have recently expanded their video optimization techniques. Blue Coat, in particular, added stream-splitting for Adobe Flash just one month earlier; it had already delivered the ability to cache Microsoft Silverlight content locally, although it does not claim to provide stream-splitting or application layer multicasting for Silverlight yet. 

All this comes at a time when Riverbed is distancing itself from its major rivals. By some estimates, Riverbed owns just over 50% of the WAN optimization market, which is about twice that of its next major rival, Cisco Systems. That is up from about 34% of the market just two years ago. Common wisdom suggests that WAN optimization is a three-horse race between Riverbed, Cisco, and Blue Coat, despite the healthy number of smaller rivals still competing in the market. Of course, as the clear market leader, Riverbed has a very large bull’s eye on its back, and competitors will be keen to take advantage of any missteps it makes. At the same time, nervous investors will keep the pure-play focused to some extent on the short term, although Riverbed has demonstrated good long-term vision in its acquisitions and partnerships.